|
|
| |
| |
Predictability
Management 
Intrusion
Prevention System |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| How
to Select Best-of-Breed Intrusion Prevention System |
| |
|
System protection and network protection
solutions are an important piece of implementing a comprehensive
security solution. Hackers are smart, creative people. They
have spawned hundreds of attacks designed to exploit known
vulnerabilities in machines and applications. Many of these
exploits are so common that they are often referred to as
well-known attacks. Network perimeters are becoming increasingly
porous which means that interaction between internal and external
systems is occurring via multiple communications paths. These
paths often bypass the classic firewall route. With the proliferation
of sophisticated attacks and the discovery of new vulnerabilities,
new methods are needed to protect precious data and network
resources. Enhanced security at multiple levels and multiple
points of corporate systems is necessary.
Traditionally, firewalls and anti-virus programs are used
to block attacks, and intrusion detection systems (IDSs) identify
attacks as they occur. Such techniques are crucial to network
security, but have limitations. Intrusion detection system
undoubtedly uses a database of defined signatures for matching
strings against well-known attacks. But the clever hacker
knows this, and continues to beat IDS by crafting attack variants
to beat signature strings, or developing attacks that exploit
new vulnerabilities. A firewall can stop attacks by blocking
certain port numbers, but it does little to analyze traffic
that uses allowed port numbers. IDSs can monitor and analyze
traffic that passes through open ports, but do not prevent
attacks.
No security solution is complete unless it can actually stop
attacks. Accurate detection is the foundation for the rich
set of real-time intrusion prevention. Selecting best of breed
Intrusion Prevention system is a critical security decision
but following are the few attributes essential for ensuring
your security delivers peace of mind.
|
| |
|
Accuracy, accuracy and more accuracy
Accuracy is at the heart of an IDS solution because it
reduces both false alarms and the chances of missing real
attacks. Poor accuracy will quickly corrode and debilitate
network security.
|
| |
|
Prevention, not just detection
Prevention is accomplished through the combination of
the following IPS requirements:
|
| |
| :: |
Operate in-line To detect and
block attacks in real-time, in-line IPS places the sensor
in the path of the data traffic to process every packet.
Passive-monitoring IDS can attempt to block only a TCP-based
attack using TCP resets; only an in-line IPS can block
all IP-, ICMP-, TCP-, and UDP-based malicious traffic.
To operate in-line, IPS must support the appropriate
type and number of interfaces and must be compatible
with Layer 1-4 devices, such as repeaters, switches,
routers, load balancers, and firewalls.
|
| :: |
Maintain reliability and availability
Uptime is essential for an in-line IPS. Reliable sensors
require an appliance platform to ensure that your IPS
can be trusted to block malicious traffic.
|
| :: |
Deliver high performance IPS
must have the processing power to handle the demands
of in-line detection and prevention. It must minimize
packet- processing latency to less than a millisecond.
|
| :: |
Enable policy granularity IPS
must allow for policy granularity in deciding which
malicious traffic gets blocked. The user must have the
ability to configure the blocking of malicious traffic
by attack and by policy.
|
|
| |
|
Broad attack coverage
No single technique or technology is the magic bullet
that guarantees protection against current or future attacks.
IPS must provide broad coverage against known, unknown (first
strike), and DoS attacks using signature detection, anomaly
detection, and DoS detection. Uniting the three methods in
one IDS solution enables the correlation of attack detection
across the various methods and increases accuracy.
IPS should also include detection and prevention of the following
threats:
|
| |
| :: |
Reconnaissance (Layers 3-7) |
| :: |
Exploits |
| :: |
Unknown exploits |
| :: |
DoS attacks |
| :: |
Policy violations |
|
| |
|
Analyze all relevant traffic
IPS must have the capability to use a broad range of data
capture modes to ensure that all relevant traffic is accessible
for detection and prevention. To this end, IPS must support
a wide variety of deployments, work within different topologies,
and deal with switched and encrypted traffic. It must monitor
hubs or mirror (SPAN) ports of switches, passively tap into
full-duplex Ethernet links, intercept and examine traffic
in-line, and work with 802.1Q VLAN Ethernet networks.
|
| |
|
Highly granular detection and response
IPS must support highly granular detection and response capabilities,
whereby specific attacks on a specific host can be detected
and a specific response can be enacted. The granularity is
a prerequisite to security policy enforcement and control.
The lack of such granularity has led some enterprises to erroneously
make automated policy enforcement decisions that resulted
in disastrous DoS conditions for their partners and employees.
Highly granular detection and response includes the capability
to apply a unique detection and response policy to a single
host, subnet, functional unit, or geographical unit.
|
| |
|
Flexible policy management
IPS must allow for maximum policy flexibility and granularity
to ensure complete and accurate detection and prevention.
A single policy does not work and scale for today's enterprise
networks. Granular policy management allows you to segment
your traffic into logical groupings and then detect specific
attacks and spell out specific responses for these logical
groups.
A policy must be customizable to each network and should not
rely on only a single policy per sensor. Finally, the policy
must have rich attributes that the user should be able to
configure and must be based on intuitive rules.
|
| |
|
Scalable threat management
IPS must scale and be responsive under heavy loads to support
an increasing number of sensors, monitored traffic, and alert
processing rates. A scalable management system reduces the
burden of managing a large number of sensors by using automated,
user-policy-driven signature updates and delegating management
resources to appropriate users using role-based access control.
IPS management should allow secure Web-based management of
an IPS system deployed throughout the enterprise network.
The management system must provide a comprehensive platform
for IPS configuration, policy management, and threat and response
management functions. Security professionals should be able
to perform these tasks remotely to eliminate the need for
physical access to the management system or sensors.
|
| |
|
Sophisticated forensics and reporting
Powerful forensic management based on data fusion provides
the necessary infrastructure to support incident analysis
and management and must be an essential element of any IPS.
Forensic management provides the intelligence to inspect incidents
and to extract summarization alerts for effective follow-ups,
be it system hardening or criminal prosecution. To collect
complete forensic information surrounding a security event,
next-generation IPS should capture and log packets before,
during, and after an attack. It must be able to roll all related
alerts into a larger, meaningful incident (alert aggregation)
or link alerts and events over time (alert correlation). IPS
must also support extensive and user-customizable reporting.
|
| |
|
Maximum sensor uptime
Reliable sensors are necessary to ensure real-time detection
and prevention. Uptime should be similar to other security
and networking devices, such as firewalls, switches, and routers.
Software sensors running on general-purpose computers; however,
lack the reliability of a purpose-built appliance. In addition,
configuring computer-based IPS requires the added burden of
hardening the operating system with the latest security patches
to correct discovered security flaws. IPS should be built
on a reliable, hardened, appliance-based sensor architecture
managed by a centralized management system.
|
| |
|
Wire-speed performance
To meet the computational demands of multi-gigabit in-line
IDS, sensors must rely on high-performance processors to meet
packet-processing rates and per-packet latency requirements.
As a necessary condition for complete detection coverage,
the sensor must be capable of seeing all the traffic on its
monitoring ports under the most stringent bursty conditions.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|