|
SSA 2005—General Industries Winner
A rapidly evolving security
architecture
A
complex infrastructure and wide-spread supply chain are
just the tip of the iceberg when the task is to secure
this FMCG giant. Meet S Narayanan, Corporate
Information Security Manager, Hindustan Lever. He is the
designer and implementer of strategies that made him the
Security Strategist in the General Industries category
for 2005. by Anil Patrick R
Information security is critical when
your organisation is in the FMCG business. In this
context, Hindustan Lever Limited’s (HLL) security
strategies deserve praise among the elite nominees of
the Security Strategist Awards 2005. Security best
practices and infrastructure have been in place at the
company since 1996. This makes the organisation one of
the forerunners and the most deserving winner.
For HLL, a turnover of more than Rs
11,000 crore in the soaps and personal products business
is the result of the combined synergies of more than 250
third-party suppliers, 80-odd third-party factories, 55
owned factories, 70 depots or warehouses, and over 7,000
stockists. Considering that the company’s IT
infrastructure reaches out to most of them, securing
this infrastructure is a major task. “We have more than
a million retailers and more than a billion customers.
IT touches our factories, some of our key suppliers, all
our distribution centres, and many of our customers,”
declares S Narayanan, Corporate Information Security
Manager at the company.
A complex challenge
Since HLL is one of the largest FMCG
companies, protection of intellectual property rights
and the company’s reputation is crucial from the
security point of view. Point to note: HLL has more than
6,000 desktops and laptops.
According to Narayanan, the biggest
challenge they face is complexity due to the large
number of locations. “The variety of desktop operating
systems ranging from Windows 95 to Windows XP is a
challenge from the security point of view. Growth of IT
infrastructure has also been rapid along with
requirements such as robust connectivity, legal
compliance requirements and user expectations,” says
Narayanan.
Over the past three years, HLL has
shifted from a decentralised approach to a centralised
architecture. This has brought with it security
challenges on the networking, server and desktop
infrastructure fronts. On the network front the
organisational LANs and WANs connect around 220 units of
the company with several layers of backup. Being part of
the Unilever group, the company also has six
international links for global connectivity. The
organisation has around 240 servers, and its server
classification is based on criticality to the business.
There are 80 very critical servers and 50 critical
servers; the rest are classified as non-critical and
used for development, testing and so on.
The company has a shared services
centre in Bangalore that handles all its back office
operations. HLL has also done a lot of outsourcing in
terms of IT and non-IT processes.
On the regulatory side, HLL has to
comply with several legal requirements. It also has to
comply with Unilever’s internal requirements and the
Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) clause 49.
| What is
unique?
The
most unique thing about HLL’s security strategy is
the active ownership from business. Assigning unit
ISO responsibility to commercial managers is a
step in the right direction to ensure active user
participation. Backed by active technology
controls and a redundant DRP architecture, S
Narayanan’s security strategy is worth
following. |
Off to an early start
Till 2001, HLL’s security policies
focussed to a great extent on virus protection with
reviews taking place once every two or three years.
However, the company realised around 2001 that as new
threats come to the fore, policies and procedures have
to be reviewed and changed frequently.
This realisation resulted in policies
and procedures assuming centre-stage. “Earlier, policies
and procedures used to change in two to three years, now
they change almost everyday. As you put in new equipment
or new vulnerabilities come in, policies and procedures
keep changing,” says Narayanan.
| HLL’s
security strategy
Processes
- Ownership of the
security policy belongs to business units
- Multifaceted
security policy customised to divisional
requirements
- Head of unit is the
unit ISO
- Ongoing user and
annual ISO training
- Random and
quarterly internal audits with annual external
audits.
Technology
- Antivirus,
vulnerability, and patch management
- Access controls,
and VLANs to restrict access
- Monitoring of
security events
- Centralised
redundant DRP architecture
|
The perspective shifts
According to Narayanan, these changes
have been the offshoot of a new mindset that security
should be comprehensive, thus moving away from looking
at IT merely to comply with legal requirements. This
change has resulted in HLL’s multi-faceted information
security policy.
First among these facets is physical
and administration security. Next comes information
protection, which classifies information according to
its level of confidentiality. It also deals with how to
handle the information once it is classified. Third is a
specific security policy, which is not relevant for some
functions. For example, in HR there is a
starter-mover-leaver process, which the normal security
policy does not cover. Functions like these have been
defined and made into a separate security policy.
Capping all this is employee culture
and behaviour. Employees are provided with a detailed
handbook that highlights changes required in culture and
behaviour. All new employees undergo an induction
training where they are exposed to security issues.
Continuing education is through e-mailers, corporate
diaries, table calendars, in-house magazines, etc.
BS 7799 FRAMEWORK
HLL’s security policy is based on the
BS 7799 framework. The required controls from the BS
7799’s 127 controls are chosen depending on the risk to
the company and its units. Periodic policy reviews are
performed, and policy changes recommended to the
steering committee which takes the final decision.
Information security initiatives are
led by business rather than IT. At present, the
Vice-president of HLL’s HR department leads information
security initiatives for India. He is the owner of the
security policy, and leads information protection
implementation and policy finalisation.
Apart from this, representatives from
each of the key functions of the company handle
different aspects of implementing policy. The steering
group consists of the chairman and finance director, and
meets once a quarter.
Pearls of
wisdom
- Work with CEOs to
ensure that they relate to security not as
a business cost, but as a competitive
marketplace advantage.
- Consider security
as an element of the larger business risk
management process and embed it in core business
processes as well.
- There is no
standard ‘one size/shoe fits all’ solution for
security. Choosing the correct strategy will
depend on factors such as the organisation, its
needs and culture.
- Create awareness
that security fosters an ethical culture. Value
and promote actions that allow no compromise of
business reputation.
|
Policing the policies
HLL’s policy implementation team
structure consists of a full-time security officer for
the company supported by four full-time officers. The
team is part of the IT group, and at each company office
the commercial manager of the unit is the part-time
information security officer (ISO).
The commercial manager is responsible
for implementation, positive insurance, and conducting
security audits. These ISOs undergo training annually at
each of the four regions. Implementation is done through
unit ISOs. Positive confirmation of these efforts is
monitored through security audits and
post-implementation audits.
Ongoing compliance monitoring is done
on a quarterly basis. Tests are conducted on HLL’s
intranet for the units.
Random audits are also done through
the company’s internal auditing called controlled
assurance. Security audits include application, network
and unit levels. HLL also does audits to check the
security of the IT infrastructure. Specialist need-based
information security audits are also performed. HLL also
undergoes BS 7799-based yearly unit information security
reviews conducted by PwC.
For a rainy day
Earlier, HLL had a decentralised DRP
architecture. It has since shifted to a centralised
approach. DRP is done from the unit level to the three
data centres (Bangalore, Gurgaon and Mumbai). “We can
respond to any disaster situation within 15 minutes,”
affirms Narayanan.
He says that the use of centralised
communication links has made DRP more reliable. These
consist of the VSAT network from HECL with Gurgaon as
the first hub connecting around 180 locations. The
network also consists of terrestrial links (about 90)
across the country backed up by ISDN links to cover
Indian offices. Network redundancy is achieved through
triangulation.
HLL’s application-level DRP strategy
is to have the application hosted in not less than two
cities. There is one live location and one DR location.
Incremental backups are performed at specified
frequencies.
Operational security
Vulnerability analysis and patch
management are important at HLL. Other technologies and
practices used by the company include data centre access
controls, password management for servers, backups for
data and application, antivirus for Windows-based
servers, vulnerability monitoring for servers and
desktops, ethical hacking and IDS.
Information security incidents
monitored include antivirus updates, patches, backup,
and server security. Apart from this, DRP, data centre
applications and the network are also monitored. Access
control tests are also performed.
External hand
Much of HLL’s IT is outsourced. About
400 non-HLL employees operate from HLL premises on tasks
from server management to software development.
Security measures are enforced on
these personnel through SLAs. “Whatever applies to a HLL
employee applies to these people. We get that in
writing. We have also got into VLANs and restricting
access,” says Narayanan.
The next task for Narayanan and his
team is the shift from MFG PRO to SAP next year. This is
a challenge that involves redefining security rules and
procedures. The company is currently evaluating
biometric devices for remote authorisation.
anilpatrick@networkmagazineindia.com
|